Top 10 Most Notorious Asset Misappropriation Fraud Cases in US History

Throughout American history, the ingenuity of fraudsters has often mirrored the evolution of technology, from the audacious Rothstein Ponzi Scheme in 2009, which unraveled a whopping $1.2 billion fraud in Florida, to the intricate Feeding Our Future COVID-Relief Fund Fraud Scheme in 2022, defrauding the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) out of $250 million. 

Asset misappropriation fraud is a timeless tale of greed and deception, but the scale and audacity of some cases are truly staggering. 

These notorious scandals don’t just rip off companies; they rip through headlines, sparkling widespread media attention and reshaping the landscape of corporate oversight. 

This article unfolds the top 10 most notorious asset misappropriation fraud cases in the US that shook the financial and technological worlds to their core. 

1. Feeding Our Future COVID-Relief Fund Fraud Scheme (2022)

In September 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice arrested 47 people connected to Minnesota nonprofit ‘’Feeding Our Future’’ for their involvement in a $250 million COVID-relief fund fraud. 

The scheme targeted the Federal Child Nutrition Program of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Among those arrested was the nonprofit’s founder and executive director, Aimee Bock.

Means: The individuals involved in this fraud scheme had direct access to critical data and systems related to the Federal Child Nutrition Program. Their positions provided them with the necessary insights into how the program operated, its funding mechanisms, and the loopholes that could be exploited. They used fake documents, including inflated invoices and attendance records to fabricate the number of children served and meals provided.

Motive: The primary motive behind this large-scale fraud was financial gain. They used the stolen money to purchase luxury items like cars, houses, jewelry, and even coastal resort property abroad.

Opportunity: The opportunity for this fraud was significantly aided by the urgency to distribute COVID-19 relief funds, coupled with inadequate controls and oversight. The relaxation of standards for participation in the Federal Child Nutrition Program during the pandemic and the allowance for for-profit entities to partake created vulnerabilities that the fraudsters exploited. Lack of proper financial oversight within the nonprofit, such as not having an accountant on staff and insufficient board oversight, also contributed to the scale of the fraud.

As of now, sixty defendants have been charged in this case, with fourteen pleading guilty and no one yet sentenced.

2. Anthony Levandowski- Trade Secret Theft (2019)

In 2019, Anthony Levandowski, a former Google engineer, was charged with the theft of trade secrets relating to Google’s self-driving car technology before joining Uber. It was considered a high-profile case of intellectual property theft in the tech industry.

Means: With extensive privileges as a leading member of Google’s Waymo project, Levandowski had unrestricted access to critical information. His technical acumen enabled him to identify and extract over 14,000 files containing pivotal details about Waymo’s LiDAR sensor technology.

Motive: His motives appeared to be driven by ambition and a desire for recognition, alongside financial gain. Levandowski sought to be seen as a pioneering figure in the self-driving car industry. This drive led him to start his own venture and engage in intellectual property theft to bolster his standing.

Opportunity: The opportunity for Levandowski to act materialized amid the less regulated information security protocols within Waymo at the time. His impending departure from Google provided a narrow window to misappropriate the confidential data to advance his new venture. This was when the company was most at risk, as he was switching jobs.

Levandowski was sentenced to 18 months in prison, fined $95,000, and ordered to pay Waymo $756,499 to cover investigation costs. 

3. Martin Shkreli Convicted of Securities Fraud (2017)

Martin Shkreli, popularly known as the “Pharma Bro,” was convicted in 2017 on three counts of fraud. These included securities fraud related to the management of two hedge funds, MSMB Capital and MSMB Healthcare and one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud i.e, illegally using his pharmaceutical company, Retrophin. 

For the first two counts, he faced up to 20 years in prison each, and up to five years for the final count. 

Shkreli, a former hedge fund manager and pharmaceutical executive, became a controversial figure for his audacious approach to both the financial and pharmaceutical industries.

Means: Shkreli’s primary tool was his deep understanding of the pharmaceutical and finance sectors. This expertise was crucial in misleading investors and covering up his fraudulent activities. Moreover, being a manager of two hedge funds and the CEO of Retrophin, Inc., gave him direct control and access to crucial financial and corporate information. His control over a large number of Retrophin shares was another key element in his scheme.

Motive: Shkreli’s actions were driven by a combination of financial benefit and a desire for prestige and recognition in his field. He used the fraudulently obtained funds to cover these losses and to continue attracting investment into his ventures, creating a facade of successful management and profitability. Despite his controversial image, partly due to raising a lifesaving drug’s price by 5,000 percent, Shkreli showed a consistent pattern of seeking to outwit and outperform in the high-stakes environments of the drug industry.

Opportunity: The opportunity for Shkreli’s fraudulent activities arose from the complex and often opaque nature of hedge fund management and pharmaceutical investments. His investors had limited insight into the actual workings and financial health of his funds, enabling him to misrepresent his success and the status of their investments. His charismatic and convincing persona further aided in this deception, allowing him to continue his scheme over a significant period before detection.

As a result, Shkreli was convicted of three of the eight counts against him, including securities fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud.  

Also Read:  A Comprehensive Guide To Techniques And Tools For Fraud Investigators (2024)

4. Rita Crundwell Embezzles $53 Million from Dixon, Illinois (2013) 

Rita A. Crundwell, the former comptroller of Dixon, Illinois, was sentenced to 19 years and 7 months in federal prison for embezzling $53.7 million from the city over two decades. This case is one of the most significant municipal frauds in U.S. history. 

Means: Crundwell used her position as comptroller to devise the fraud. She opened a secret bank account in the city’s name, which she alone controlled, and began transferring money from city accounts into this account in 1990. She covered her tracks by creating fake invoices and misleading city officials about budget shortfalls due to delayed state tax revenue payments.

Motive: The embezzlement was driven by Crundwell’s desire to finance her extravagant lifestyle such as a $2 million custom RV, a Florida vacation home and her horse farming operations, RC Quarter Horses LLC. Despite receiving an annual salary of $80,000, Crundwell lived well beyond her means, funding her lifestyle with stolen public funds.

Opportunity: The opportunity for Crundwell’s embezzlement arose from her control over the city’s finances and lack of oversight. The fraud was only discovered when co-workers stumbled upon the hidden account during her extended unpaid vacation.

Crundwell was sentenced to nearly the maximum 20-year term and must serve at least 85 percent of her 235-month sentence. She was also ordered to pay restitution totaling $53,740,394. The U.S. Marshals Service has recovered more than $12.38 million from the sale of her assets, including horses, property, and personal belongings.

5. Patricia Smith Landscaping Embezzlement Case (2012)

In 2012, Patricia Smith, the former controller of Baierl Acura, an auto dealership in Pennsylvania, was sentenced to prison for embezzling $10 million over seven years. Smith’s case stands out for the sheer scale of the theft and the extravagant ways in which she spent the stolen funds.

Means: Smith’s role as the controller at Baierl Acura granted her direct access to the company’s financial systems. She had the authority to manage accounts, handle checks, and oversee financial transactions. This level of access and control enabled her to redirect funds, alter financial statements, and mask her fraudulent activities. Over time, she made more than 800 transfers, using the dealership’s online account system to funnel the money without detection.

Motive: The driving force behind Smith’s embezzlement was a desire for luxury, and an emotional drive to ‘earn’ love and happiness through material means that her regular income could not support. She stole some $4000 per day on average and spent the stolen money on private jets, Broadway shows, Super Bowl tickets, and even trips to the Vatican. The embezzlement provided her with the means to sustain this extravagant way of living, far beyond what her legitimate salary of $50,000 would allow.

Opportunity: The opportunity for Smith to commit fraud was largely due to a lack of oversight at Baierl Aura. The trust placed in her as a long-term employee meant that her financial activities were not scrutinized closely. This lack of checks and balances within the company’s financial department created an environment where fraud could go undetected for years.

Patricia Smith was sentenced to 78 months in prison and three years of probation. She was also ordered to pay restitution amounting to $10,349,569.14. 

6. Rajat Gupta Insider Trading and Fraud Case (2012)

Rajat Gupta, a former head of McKinsey & Company and a notable figure in the global business community, was convicted of insider trading. His case was a significant fall from grace, highlighting the risks of unethical practices in high-level corporate environments.

Means: Gupta’s insider trading scheme was facilitated by his positions on the boards of Goldman Sachs and Procter & Gamble, among others. His high-ranking roles provided him with access to confidential information, which he was found guilty of sharing with Raj Rajaratnam, the founder of the Galleon Group hedge fund, who was already serving an 11-year prison sentence for securities fraud.

Motive: The motive behind Gupta’s involvement in insider trading appears to be tied to financial benefits and possibly a desire to enhance his standing or gain favor with associates in hedge funds and investment circles. This makes his involvement in the scheme even more perplexing, as it contrasts sharply with his otherwise successful and respected career.

Opportunity: Gupta’s opportunity to engage in insider trading arose from his extensive network and deep integration into the upper position of the business world. His close association with influential figures like Rajaratnam provided the channels through which confidential information could be illicitly communicated.

Gupta was found guilty on four out of six charges, including three counts of securities fraud and one count of conspiracy. He faces up to 20 years in prison for each of the securities fraud counts and up to five years for the conspiracy count. 

7. Helmut Kiener $300 Million Fraud Conviction- (2011) 

Helmut Kiener, a German national and hedge fund manager, was charged with directing a fraudulent scheme that caused more than $311 million in losses. The charges included wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering, highlighting a complex international financial fraud.

Means: Kiener controlled several hedge funds, including K1 Global Limited and K1 Invest. He and his partner, John C. Tausche, were accused of defrauding institutional investors like Bear Stearns by misrepresenting the management and performance of these funds. The indictment alleged that Kiener channeled money through various funds to create the illusion of growth and viability in his investments.

Motive: Kiener’s motive was primarily financial gain. He earned substantial fees while investors continued to pour money into what they believed were diversified and independently managed funds. Kiener used the defrauded funds for personal enrichment, purchasing luxury real estate, vehicles, a private jet, a helicopter, and luxury watercraft. 

Opportunity: The opportunity for Kiener’s fraud was created by the lack of transparency in hedge fund operations and the trust investors placed in him. The complex nature of hedge fund investments and the limited oversight from authorities in different countries made it easier for him to manipulate the system for many years without detection.

Kiener faced a sentence of 200 years in prison and a fine of $7.936 million. His partner, Tausche, faced up to 40 years in prison and a fine of $1.974 million. The case was notable for its international scope, involving multiple countries’ law enforcement agencies and financial institutions.

8. Kweku Adoboli’s Unauthorized Trading Losses for UBS (2011) 

Kweku Adoboli, a former trader at UBS, was charged with fraud and false accounting, which led to a staggering $2.3 billion loss at the Swiss bank. His actions marked one of the biggest banking frauds in history and raised serious questions about risk management in financial institutions.

Means: Adoboli’s role on the Delta One trading desk at UBS, where he dealt with exchange-traded funds (ETFs), provided him with the means to execute unauthorized trades. Using the skills he acquired in UBS’s back office, he entered false information into the bank’s systems to conceal the enormous risks associated with his trades.

Motive: Adoboli’s actions seem to have been driven by a desire to maximize profits, as evidenced by his failure to hedge these transactions. His motive was to enhance his success and reputation within the bank, as he pursued increasingly risky financial strategies without authorization.

Opportunity: The opportunity for Adoboli’s fraudulent actions was partly due to weaknesses in UBS’s risk management and oversight mechanisms. There was a lack of adequate controls to quickly detect and prevent the type of unauthorized trading he was engaged in. Additionally, the high-pressure environment and the focus on short-term gains within the banking sector may have contributed to his decision to take such extreme risks.

Adoboli’s actions not only resulted in monumental financial losses but also severely tarnished UBS’s reputation. He was convicted of two counts of fraud and sentenced to seven years in prison.

Also Read: Fraud Analytics In Banking: Best Practices For Prevention And Investigation

9. Koss Corp CFO Sujata Sachdeva’s Embezzlement Case (2010) 

In 2010, Sujata Sachdeva, the former Vice President of Finance, Secretary, and Principal Accounting Officer for Koss Corporation, was indicted on six counts of wire fraud. This case is notable for its sheer scale, with Sachdeva accused of embezzling over $31 million from the publicly traded company.

Means: Sachdeva, along with Senior Accountant Julie Mulvaney, exploited weak internal controls at Koss to carry out her embezzlement. They were able to bypass approval processes for large wire transfers and cashier’s checks, allowing Sachdeva to transfer company funds for her personal use. Her high level of control over financial transactions and oversight of accounting at Koss allowed her to carry out and conceal her actions over an extended period. 

Motive: Sachdeva’s embezzlement was primarily motivated by personal gain. She used the stolen funds for personal expenses, including luxury travel, high-end clothing, and other personal luxuries. This extravagant spending was well beyond what she could afford on her legitimate income.

Opportunity: The opportunity for Sachdeva’s embezzlement was facilitated by Koss’s outdated computerized accounting systems that lacked adequate security features, enabling undetected post-closing changes to the books.

Sachdeva pleaded guilty to six counts of wire fraud and was sentenced to 11 years in prison and $1.5 million in fines, plus forfeiture of assets purchased with the embezzled funds and restitution.

10. Scott W. Rothstein Ponzi Scheme (2009) 

In 2009, former lawyer Scott Rothstein was sentenced to 50 years in federal prison for staging a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme through his Fort Lauderdale law firm. This case stands as one of the largest financial frauds in Florida’s history in scale and audacity. 

Means: Rothstein’s scheme was facilitated by his position and reputation as a successful attorney. He created false bank documents and phony settlement agreements to lure investors, promising lucrative returns when the cases settled. This classic Ponzi scheme tactic involved using funds from new investors to pay off earlier investors, creating the illusion of a successful investment strategy.

Motive: Rothstein’s fraudulent activities funded an extraordinary lifestyle that included yachts, sports cars, and significant political contributions. His rise from humble beginnings to a position of wealth and influence in South Florida society was driven by greed and ambition, ultimately leading to his criminal activities.

Opportunity: The law firm’s lack of stringent internal controls and oversight procedures created an environment where Rothstein could execute his scheme without immediate detection. The firm’s trust in Rothstein, combined with inadequate checks and balances, presented an opportunity for him to manipulate the system. The scheme eventually led to the collapse of his law firm, Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, which had employed more than 70 lawyers.

Rothstein was sentenced to 50 years in prison, ten years more than the prosecutors had requested and significantly more than he had hoped to receive. 

How can Corporations Prevent Themselves from Getting Defrauded?

The array of asset misappropriation cases across history serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerability of corporations to fraud. Understanding and addressing the loopholes that allowed these frauds to occur is essential in safeguarding a corporation’s assets. 

Here’s a deeper look into these vulnerabilities and the corresponding control measures:

Lack of Internal Controls and Inadequate Oversight

The convergence of weak internal controls in financial management and a lack of diligent oversight by senior management or board members significantly heightens the risk of fraud within corporations. 

This vulnerability often arises from insufficient segregation of duties, inadequate reconciliation processes, ineffective auditing practices, and a culture that discourages questioning or cross-checking financial activities. 

How to deal with it: Implement stringent internal controls, including segregation of duties, to ensure no single individual has control over all aspects of a financial transaction. Regular, thorough internal and external audits, combined with active oversight and review of financial statements by management and the board, are crucial in this regard.  

Weak Ethical Culture and Policies

When employees are either unclear about what constitutes unethical behavior due to insufficient training or are fearful of repercussions for reporting wrongdoing, the risk of fraud escalates. The absence of regular ethical assessments further increases the issue, leaving the organization vulnerable to corrupt activities.

How to deal with it: Develop and enforce strong ethical policies, including clear, confidential reporting channels for whistleblowers. Regular ethics training and communication can reinforce this culture.

Outdated or Insecure Financial Systems

Older financial systems may lack advanced security features, making them susceptible to fraud. Additionally, outdated systems often fail to keep pace with the sophisticated methods employed by fraudsters, leaving corporate assets and data vulnerable. 

How to deal with it: Regularly update financial systems with advanced security measures. Use fraud detection software to monitor and analyze transactions for unusual patterns. 

Ineffective Employee Screening Processes

When thorough background checks are not conducted, especially for positions involving financial responsibility, there’s a risk of hiring individuals with a history of unethical or fraudulent behavior. This oversight can lead to scenarios where employees with questionable integrity are entrusted with the organization’s assets. 

How to deal with it: Strengthening the screening process, including comprehensive background checks and rigorous reference verifications, is vital for mitigating this risk. 

Inadequate Risk Management

Inadequate risk management in a corporation can lead to significant vulnerabilities, particularly in the context of fraud. Without regular risk assessments, a company might not recognize emerging risks or areas susceptible to fraud, such as new financial processes or changing market dynamics. 

How to deal with it: To address this gap, corporations must implement a robust risk management framework. This includes performing detailed and regular risk evaluations, staying abreast of the latest fraud trends, and adapting strategies to mitigate identified risks. 

Absence of a Defined Fraud Response Plan

Without a structured and predetermined plan of action, organizations may find themselves unprepared and reactive rather than proactive when fraud is detected. This lack of preparedness can lead to delayed responses, mismanagement of the situation, and potentially greater losses. 

How to deal with it: Establish a comprehensive fraud response plan detailing the procedures for immediate action upon detection of fraud, including steps for an internal investigation, legal recourse, and effective communication with stakeholders.

By addressing these vulnerabilities with targeted control measures, corporations can significantly enhance their resilience against fraud, safeguarding their assets and reputation.

Also Read: Asset Misappropriation Fraud: A Comprehensive Guide For Federal Fraud Investigators

How can ScanWriter be Instrumental in Investigating Asset Misappropriation Fraud? 

Staying ahead of the curve is crucial in the relentless endeavor to combat asset misappropriation fraud.

Leveraging advanced tools like ScanWriter can make a significant difference in this fight. 

ScanWriter offers remarkable assistance by transforming how investigators and financial professionals handle massive amounts of data. The key benefits of using ScanWriter are: 

  • Complex Pattern Detection: Identifying intricate patterns and abnormalities within extensive datasets, crucial for early fraud detection.
  • Streamlined Processes: Streamlining various processes, from automated data capture, data normalization, data visualization, case management, enhancing overall operational efficiency.
  • Enhanced Accuracy: Ensuring the data captured is 100% accurate and supporting 40,000+ formats of various financial documents like bank statements, checks, wire transfers, etc.
  • Reduced Time Investment: Reducing the time spent on data entry and analysis from months to weeks.
  • Top-Notch Security: Being available as a Desktop application that stays within the premises provides an additional layer of security against data breaches.

ScanWriter is a trusted choice for many public service agencies across the USA. The team also offers a 14-day free pilot program exclusively to government officials.

To learn more about the ScanWriter, book a free demo today!


Try ScanWriter Today